So, you might have the best idea that has the potential to disrupt the market. You can hire a top-notch developer to give it a shape, use cutting-edge technology, and whatnot. But does that guarantee its success? Does that ensure that itll be one of the most excellent implementations?
If you think so, think again. And thats because you are missing out on one of the most critical aspects of the software development lifecycle, the SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE.
Software development is an amalgamation of various steps. This includes concept outlining, design, development, testing, and a lot more. However, this is not just it. Another crucial step is that of software architecture planning. In this article, well explore how software architecture breathes life into your software. So lets gets started
Simply put, software architecture is the set of well-aligned technical decisions, all of which are targeted to meet a single goal. That is, to ensure that code structure satisfies the requirement of software. In the initial phase carried out during design and before development, the front-end squad and back-end crew meet in order to plan out software development in such a way that software is stable and scalable right from the start of development.
Why are we even discussing this? Well, simply because, for most of us these two terms mean the same. Very often, software architecture is confused with design. However, the two are different terms and hold their significance when it comes to software development.
The design is the basic structure of software. On the other hand, architecture refers to the rules and regulations. It radically dictates the set of constraints that define a particular system which also includes the set of design rules. These rules are driven by multiple factors including the limitations of technology being used, the code structure, and the constraints that dictate the triggers of code.
The design is how you approach a particular problem, which is highly determined by the current requirements. A good design is easier to understand and implement while involving the least modification costs. Someone can easily modify the design at the local level without considering any risk to the software. The design is more related to the structure of the system; it defines the primary flow of the system. It results in the amalgamation of interlinked components and their composition.
In a nutshell: Design is the meat to the skeleton of architecture.
While design actually refers to the implementation of the set of requirements, the architecture of software takes care of the realization of these requirements. This routes through the course of development and tends to change over time with varying needs.
Architecture can be more referred to as "strategic designing." In other words, it talks about the principles that dictate the systems development and structure. Failure to write a proper system architecture might end you up giving time for its restructuring right from the start.
A robust architecture not only ensures efficient and rewarding software development but also decreases the cost significantly. It provides a strong backbone to the software that supports its scalability. That is, architecture is perfected by thinking well-in-advance and might be time-consuming. In addition, it also has a higher cost associated with it. However, it is worth noting that it is fruitful in the long run.
There is no specific set of rules when it comes to great software architecture. In general sense, various important aspects of software architecture are linked together and significantly depend on each other. Here are some of the things, though, that much help to plan up a great architecture:
Architecture should be reliable and easily maintainable.
Domain concepts should be understandable to each member.
It should be adaptable, scalable, and usable in the long run.
It should ensure that there are no code repetitions.
Refactoring should be easy.
Performance should not degrade with feature addition.
It should be extendible.
Well, determining if your architecture is good or not might be bewildering. We have a pro-top though. Look nowhere other than the product itself. The software developed as a result speaks volume of the quality of software architecture. Lets look at some of the indicators:
Software turns out to be user-friendly.
The solution is scalable to adjust any type of growth and adaptable.
Software attracts the users the way it should by working how the user expects it to.
The solution offers excellent performance and runs fast.
Modifications and functionality additions are easy.
Testing and maintaining the code is easy.
Software turns out robust and reliable.
Software architecture lays a firm foundation of a great solution, and that clearly explains why you should be highly obsessed with it. Whats the point of giving a solution that is not capable of meeting the changing requirements and accommodating the growth? Honestly speaking, youll end up adding a bit more to the already existing software junk. So, give it great shape with an equally fantastic architecture to leave a long-lasting mark in the industry.